Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA
dc.contributor.author | Krummenauer, Alex | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Veit, Hugo Marcelo | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Ferreira, Jane Zoppas | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-09T04:44:41Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 1742-6588 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250815 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract | Comparison with reference method is one of the necessary requirements for the validation of non-standard methods. This comparison was made using the experiment planning technique with two-way ANOVA. In ANOVA, the results obtained using the EDXRF method, to be validated, were compared with the results obtained using the ASTM E572-13 standard test method. Fisher's tests (F -test) were used to comparative study between of the elements: molybdenum, niobium, copper, nickel, manganese, chromium and vanadium. All F -tests of the elements indicate that the null hypothesis (Ho) has not been rejected. As a result, there is no significant difference between the methods compared. Therefore, according to this study, it is concluded that the EDXRF method was approved in this method comparison requirement. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of physics : conference series. Bristol. Vol. 975 (2018), 012004 | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Open Access | en |
dc.subject | Estudo comparativo | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Análise de variância | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Fluorescência de raios X | pt_BR |
dc.title | Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.nrb | 001086729 | pt_BR |
dc.type.origin | Estrangeiro | pt_BR |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

-
Artículos de Periódicos (42116)Ingeniería (2532)