Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPinto, Stephanie Santanapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlberton, Cristine Limapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Paulo André Poli dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorTiggemann, Carlos Leandropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKruel, Luiz Fernando Martinspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-25T01:45:53Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2008pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1517-8692pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/71924pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAs aulas de hidroginastica estao cada vez mais diversificadas com o uso de materiais apropriados ao meio aquatico. Entretanto, poucos estudos verificaram a influencia da utilizacao de tais materiais nas respostas cardiorrespiratorias. O objetivo foi analisar as respostas de frequencia cardiaca, consumo de oxigenio e sensacao subjetiva ao esforco em mulheres durante a execucao de um exercicio de hidroginastica em diferentes situacoes com e sem o equipamento resistivo Aquafins ®. Onze mulheres realizaram o exercicio deslize frontal com a flexao e extensao horizontal de ombros em quatro situacoes: sem equipamento resistivo (S-FINS), com Aquafins ® nos membros inferiores (FINS-MIs), com Aquafins® nos membros superiores (FINS-MSs) e com Aquafins® nos membros superiores e inferiores (FINS-MIs/MSs). Em todas as situacoes foi verificado a FC, o VO2 e a SSE. Utilizou-se ANOVA para medidas repetidas, com post-hoc de Bonferroni (p < 0,05). A FC foi significativamente mais elevada nas situacoes FINS-MIs/MSs (159 ± 12bpm) e FINS-MIs (147 ± 18bpm), comparando-as com as demais situacoes. No entanto, a situacao FINS-MIs apresentou FC similar a FINS-MSs (148 ± 16 bpm). Por sua vez, as tres situacoes com o Aquafins® foram diferentes da situacao S-FINS (131 ± 14bpm). Para o VO2 houve diferenca significativa entre a situacao FINS-MIs/MSs (22,77 ± 3,58ml.kg-1.min-1), comparando-a com as demais. As situacoes FINS-MSs (19,67 ± 4,29ml.kg-1.min-1) e FINS-MIs (20,38 ± 3,99ml.kg-1.min-1) apresentaram VO2 significativamente maior que S-FINS (15,18 ± 4,67ml.kg-1.min-1). A SSE foi significativamente maior na situacao FINS-MIs/MSs (16 ± 1,55), comparando-a com FINS-MIs (14 ± 0,9) e S-FINS (13 ± 1,29), entretanto, nao foi diferente da FINS-MSs (14 ± 1,57). Portanto, a utilizacao de equipamentos que promovam resistencia ao movimento na hidroginastica e indicada para melhorias no sistema cardiorrespiratorio.pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAquatic exercise sessions are becoming increasingly diversified due to the use of apparatus appropriate to aquatic environment. However, few studies analyzed the influence of the use of such apparatus in the cardiorespiratory responses. The purpose was to analyze the heart rate, oxygen consumption and the rating of perceived exertion of effort in women during an aquatic exercise performed in different situations with and without resistive equipment, Aquafins(tm). Eleven women performed the cross country skiing exercise with horizontal shoulder flexion and extension in four situations: without resistive equipment (NO-FINS), with Aquafins(tm) on the lower limbs (FINS-LLs), with Aquafins(tm) on the upper limbs (FINS-ULs) and with Aquafins(tm) on the lower and upper limbs (FINS-LLs/ULs). In each situation HR, VO2 and SSE were verified. For data analysis, ANOVA for repeated measures were used, with the Bonferroni post-hoc test (p < 0.05). When compared to the other situations, HR was significantly higher with the FINS-LLs/ULs (159 ± 12 bpm) and FINS-LLs (147 ± 18 bpm). However, the FINS-LLs situation exhibited a similar HR to that of FINS-ULs (148 ± 16 bpm). In turn, the three situations with Aquafins(tm) were different from the NO-FINS (131 ± 14 bpm) situation. In the case of VO2, there was a significant difference between the FINS-LLs/ULs (22.77 ± 3.58 ml.kg-1.min-1) situation and the other situations. The FINS-ULs (19.67 ± 4.29 ml.kg-1.min-1) and FINS-LLs (20.38 ± 3.99 ml.kg-1.min-1) situations exhibited significantly higher VO2 levels than NO-FINS (15.18 ± 4.67 ml.kg-1.min-1). The RPE was significantly greater in the FINS-LLs/ULs (16 ± 1.55) situation when compared to FINS-LLs (14 ± 0.9) and NO-FINS (13±1.29), though there was no difference from the FINS-ULs (14 ± 1.57) situation. Therefore, the use of equipments that promote resistence to the movement in aquatic exercise is recommended to improvement in the cardiorespiratory system.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista brasileira de medicina do esporte. Vol. 14, n. 4 (jul./ago. 2008), p. 357-361pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectFrequência cardíacapt_BR
dc.subjectHeart rateen
dc.subjectConsumo de oxigêniopt_BR
dc.subjectOxygen consumptionen
dc.subjectPerceived exertionen
dc.subjectHidroginásticapt_BR
dc.subjectFisiologia do exercíciopt_BR
dc.subjectResistive apparatusen
dc.titleRespostas de freqüência cardíaca, consumo de oxigênio e sensação subjetiva ao esforço em um exercício de hidroginástica executado por mulheres em diferentes situações com e sem o equipamento Aquafins®pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeHeart rate, oxygen consumption and rating of perceived exertion responses in a water aerobic exercise performed by women at different situations with and without the Aquafins apparatus en
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000683522pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples