Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorÁvila, Leandropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Reinaldo Bomfim dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Nathalli Rogiski dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Camilapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAver, Cássia Silmarapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFan, Fernando Mainardipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T03:34:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/262981pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe assessment of seasonal streamflow forecasting is essential for appropriate water resource management. A suitable seasonal forecasting system requires the evaluation of both numerical weather prediction (NWP) and hydrological models to represent the atmospheric and hydrological processes and conditions in a specific region. In this paper, we evaluated the ECMWF-SEAS5 precipitation product with four hydrological models to represent seasonal streamflow forecasts performed at hydropower plants in the Legal Amazon region. The adopted models included GR4J, HYMOD, HBV, and SMAP, which were calibrated on a daily scale for the period from 2014 to 2019 and validated for the period from 2005 to 2013. The seasonal streamflow forecasts were obtained for the period from 2017 to 2019 by considering a daily scale streamflow simulation comprising an ensemble with 51 members of forecasts, starting on the first day of every month up to 7 months ahead. For each forecast, the corresponding monthly streamflow time series was estimated. A post-processing procedure based on the adjustment of an autoregressive model for the residuals was applied to correct the bias of seasonal streamflow forecasts. Hence, for the calibration and validation period, the results show that the HBV model provides better results to represent the hydrological conditions at each hydropower plant, presenting NSE and NSElog values greater than 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, during the calibration stage. However, the SMAP model achieves a better performance with NSE values of up to 0.5 for the raw forecasts. In addition, the bias correction displayed a significant improvement in the forecasts for all hydrological models, specifically for the representation of streamflow during dry periods, significantly reducing the variability of the residuals.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofWater. Basel. Vol. 15, no. 9 (May 2023), [Article] 1695, 20 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectPrevisão hidrológicapt_BR
dc.subjectHydrological modelen
dc.subjectECMWF-SEAS5en
dc.subjectPrevisão de vazõespt_BR
dc.subjectHydropower planten
dc.subjectModelos hidrológicospt_BR
dc.subjectTocantins, Rio, Baciapt_BR
dc.subjectStreamflow forecasten
dc.titleSeasonal streamflow forecast in the Tocantins river basin, Brazil : an evaluation of ecmwf-seas5 with multiple conceptual hydrological modelspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001171347pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples