Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Matheus Lotharpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Guilherme Vieira Bragapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFabrício, Daniel Antônio Kapperpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorReguly, Afonsopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T04:27:43Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2176-1515pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/220488pt_BR
dc.description.abstractStandardized tests may not always achieve all their analytical objectives. Particularly to structural integrity, where a reproduction of the practical occurrences of the industry is desired, new techniques are being developed. Therefore, this work aims at evaluating fracture toughness in tensile armour through four measurement methodologies (standard, video, laser and stretch zone (SZ)) to obtain crack tip opening displacement (CTOD), and compares their responses by ANOVA and Duncan’s tests. The findings showed equivalence between the standard and other approaches, thus allowing distinct methods for fracture toughness evaluation.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofTecnologia em metalurgia, materiais e mineração. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 18 (2021), Art. e2458, 6 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectResistência à fraturapt_BR
dc.subjectFracture toughnessen
dc.subjectCrack tip opening displacementen
dc.subjectEnsaios de traçãopt_BR
dc.subjectTensile armour wireen
dc.subjectAnálise estatísticapt_BR
dc.subjectStatistical analysisen
dc.titleComparative study between crack tip opening displacement techniques by statistical analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001124378pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem