Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMonte, Thais Lampertpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorReckziegel, Estela da Rosapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAugustin, Marina Coutinhopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Lucas Dorídio Lockspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Amanda Senna Pereira dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Gabriel Vasatapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMattos, Eduardo Preusser dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorPedroso, José Luizpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarsottini, Orlando Graziani Povoaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Fernando Reglapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Maria Luiza Saraivapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCamey, Suzi Alvespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLeotti, Vanessa Bielefeldtpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJardim, Laura Bannachpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T02:25:43Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1750-1172pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/172650pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) affects several neurological structures, giving rise to multiple symptoms. However, only the natural history of ataxia is well known, as measured during the study duration. We aimed to describe the progression rate of ataxia, by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), as well as the progression rate of the overall neurological picture, by the Neurological Examination Score for Spinocerebellar Ataxias (NESSCA), and not only during the study duration but also in a disease duration model. Comparisons between these models might allow us to explore whether progression is linear during the disease duration in SCA2; and to look for potential modifiers. Results: Eighty–eight evaluations were prospectively done on 49 symptomatic subjects; on average (SD), study duration and disease duration models covered 13 (2.16) months and 14 (6.66) years of individuals’ life, respectively. SARA progressed 1.75 (CI 95%: 0.92–2.57) versus 0.79 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.14) points/year in the study duration and disease duration models NESSCA progressed 1.45 (CI 95%: 0.74–2.16) versus 0.41 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.59) points/year in the same models. In order to explain these discrepancies, the progression rates of the study duration model were plotted against disease duration. Then an acceleration was detected after 10 years of disease duration: SARA scores progressed 0.35 before and 2.45 points/year after this deadline (p = 0.013). Age at onset, mutation severity, and presence of amyotrophy, parkinsonism, dystonic manifestations and cognitive decline at baseline did not influence the rate of disease progression. Conclusions: NESSCA and SARA progression rates were not constant during disease duration in SCA2: early phases of disease were associated with slower progressions. Modelling of future clinical trials on SCA2 should take this phenomenon into account, since disease duration might impact on inclusion criteria, sample size, and study duration. Our database is available online and accessible to future studies aimed to compare the present data with other cohorts.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofOrphanet journal of rare diseases. London. Vol. 13, no. 20 (Jan. 2018), [8 p.]pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectHistória naturalpt_BR
dc.subjectNatural historyen
dc.subjectAtaxias espinocerebelarespt_BR
dc.subjectNESSCAen
dc.subjectProgressão da doençapt_BR
dc.subjectProgression rateen
dc.subjectSARAen
dc.subjectSCAFIen
dc.subjectSpinocerebellar ataxia type 2en
dc.titleThe progression rate of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 changes with stage of diseasept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001059898pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples