Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCasanova, Gislaine Krolowpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSpritzer, Poli Marapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-11T02:18:07Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2012pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1476-511Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/109962pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Much attention has been drawn to the deleterious effects of adding progestins to estrogen as hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women. Some widely prescribed progestins have been shown to partially oppose the beneficial effects of estrogens on surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Progestins with higher androgenic activity may interfere with lipid profile and glucose tolerance, and could affect mechanisms of estrogen-induced C-reactive protein (CRP) stimulation. Recent data have shown that norpregnane derivatives, but not micronized progesterone, increase the risk of venous thromboembolism among transdermal estrogens users. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of combining micronized progesterone with non-oral estrogen therapy on lipid profile and cardiovascular risk factors in a sample of early postmenopausal women. Methods: Clinical trial including 40 women receiving intranasal 17β estradiol 3 mg/day for two months and 46 women receiving percutaneous 17β estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day for three months (E2). Both groups received an additional 200 mg/day of micronized progesterone by vaginal route 14 days/month (E2+P). Outcome measures included body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), lipid profile and ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (usCRP) at baseline and during the E2 or E2+P portions of treatment. Results: Mean age was 51±3 years. Mean time since menopause was 22.2±10 months. Most participants were overweight; HT did not change BMI. E2 and E2+P did not affect waist circumference and weight. Menopausal symptoms improved after HT. The effects of intranasal and percutaneous estradiol were similar, regardless of the addition of progesterone. Similarly, for the overall group of 86 women, micronized progesterone did not alter the response to E2. Blood pressure, glucose, insulin, HDL-c, triglycerides, and usCRP remained constant with or without micronized progesterone. Total cholesterol decreased after E2, and progesterone maintained this reduction. LDL-c levels were similar at baseline and with E2, and lower during E2+P in relation to baseline. Conclusions: Cyclic, short term exposure to vaginal micronized progesterone did not alter the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of non-oral E2 in early, apparently healthy, postmenopausal women. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01432028.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofLipids in health and disease. London. Vol. 11 (2012), 7p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectLipídeospt_BR
dc.subjectLipid profileen
dc.subjectEarly postmenopauseen
dc.subjectPós-menopausapt_BR
dc.subjectProgesteronapt_BR
dc.subjectMicronized progesteroneen
dc.subjectEstrogêniospt_BR
dc.subjectNon-oral estrogenen
dc.subjectHormone therapyen
dc.subjectTerapia de reposição hormonalpt_BR
dc.titleEffects of micronized progesterone added to non-oral estradiol on lipids and cardiovascular risk factors in early postmenopause : a clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000867380pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples