Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Rodrigo Piltcher dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Pedro San Martinpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHutten, Débora Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchnnor, Cláudia C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Isabelle Garibaldipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRabolini, Bruno Brasilpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Brenda Massochinpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Rafaela Girardipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVolkweis, Bernardo Silveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGrudtner, Marco Aureliopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCavazzola, Leandro Tottipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-18T06:59:31Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2325-4637pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/290496pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground Incisional hernia (IH) is an important surgical complication that has several ways of prevention, including modifications in the surgical technique of the initial procedure. Its incidence can reach 69% in high-risk patients and long-term followup. Of the risky procedures, open abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy is the one with the highest risk. Ways to reduce this morbid complication were suggested, and prophylactic mesh rises as an important tool to prevent recurrence. Methods A retrospective cohort study review of medical records of patients undergoing vascular surgery for abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAA) or vascular bypass surgery due to aortoiliac occlusive disease. We identified 193 patients treated between 2010 and 2020. We further performed a one-to-nine matching analysis between the use of prophylactic mesh and control groups, based on estimated propensity scores for each patient. Results Prophylactic mesh group had a 18% lower risk of IH, compared with the control group (relative risk: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] ¼ 0.74–0.93). The difference in IH rates between the groups compared was 2.6% (95% CI: 19.8 to 25.5). From the perspective of the number needed to treat, it would be necessary to use prophylactic mesh in 39 (95% CI: 35–44) patients to avoid one IH in this population. Conclusion Use of prophylactic mesh in the repair of AAA significantly reduces the incidence of IH in nearly one in five cases. Our data suggest that there is benefit in the use of prophylactic mesh in open aneurysmectomy surgery regarding postoperative IH development.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofAorta : official journal of the Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Stamford. Vol. 11, no. 3 (2023), p. 107–111pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectHérnia incisionalpt_BR
dc.subjectHerniaen
dc.subjectIncisional herniaen
dc.subjectProcedimentos cirúrgicos vascularespt_BR
dc.subjectVascular surgeryen
dc.subjectAortapt_BR
dc.subjectAneurysmectomyen
dc.subjectAbdominal surgeryen
dc.titleIncisional hernias after vascular surgery for aortoiliac aneurysm and aortoiliac occlusive arterial disease : has prophylactic mesh changed this scenario?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001244617pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples