Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPeyré-Tartaruga, Leonardo Alexandrept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Esthevan Machado dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Patrick dos Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBorba, Edilson Fernando dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorTartaruga, Marcus Peikriswilipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBuzzachera, Cosme Franklimpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCorreale, Lucapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLanferdini, Fábio Junerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Edson Soares dapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-25T07:00:51Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/283980pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground The maximal running speed (VMAX) determined on a graded treadmill test is well-recognized as a running performance predictor. However, few studies have assessed the variables that predict VMAX in recreationally active runners. Methods We used a mathematical procedure combining Fick’s law and metabolic cost analysis to verify the relation between (1) VMAX versus anthropometric and physiological determinants of running performance and, (2) theoretical metabolic cost versus running biomechanical parameters. Linear multiple regression and bivariate correlation were applied. We aimed to verify the biomechanical, physiological, and anthropometrical determinants of VMAX in recreationally active runners. Fifteen recreationally active runners participated in this observational study. A Conconi and a stead-steady running test were applied using a heart rate monitor and a simple video camera to register the physiological and mechanical variables, respectively. Results Statistical analysis revealed that the speed at the second ventilatory threshold, theoretical metabolic cost, and fat-mass percentage confidently estimated the individual running performance as follows: VMAX = 58.632 + (−0.183 * fat percentage) + (−0.507 * heart rate percentage at second ventilatory threshold) + (7.959 * theoretical metabolic cost) (R2 = 0.62, p = 0.011, RMSE = 1.50 km.h−1). Likewise, the theoretical metabolic cost was significantly explained (R2 = 0.91, p = 0.004, RMSE = 0.013 a.u.) by the running spatiotemporal and elastic-related parameters (contact and aerial times, stride length and frequency, and vertical oscillation) as follows: theoretical metabolic cost = 10.421 + (4.282 * contact time) + (−3.795 * aerial time) + (−2.422 * stride length) + (−1.711 * stride frequency) + (0.107 * vertical oscillation). Conclusion Critical determinants of elastic mechanism, such as maximal vertical force and vertical and leg stiffness were unrelated to the metabolic economy. VMAX, a valuable marker of running performance, and its physiological and biomechanical determinants can be effectively evaluated using a heart rate monitor, treadmill, and a digital camera, which can be used in the design of training programs to recreationally active runners.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ. Corte Madera. Vol. 12, (2024), e16940, 19 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectLocomotionen
dc.subjectLocomoçãopt_BR
dc.subjectCorridapt_BR
dc.subjectMaximal running speeden
dc.subjectMaximal incremental testen
dc.subjectVelocidadept_BR
dc.subjectFat percentageen
dc.subjectLimiar anaeróbiopt_BR
dc.subjectAnaerobic thresholden
dc.subjectMetabolismopt_BR
dc.subjectCinemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectMetabolic costen
dc.subjectKinematicsen
dc.subjectFrequência cardíacapt_BR
dc.subjectHeart rateen
dc.titleBiomechanical, physiological and anthropometrical predictors of performance in recreational runnerspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001210924pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples