Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorAbegg, Arthur Dieselpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos Júnior, Alfredo Pedroso dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Henrique Caldeirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBattilana, Jaquelinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Roberta Graboskipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVianna, Fernanda Sales Luizpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Weverton dos Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFagundes, Nelson Jurandi Rosapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCastille, Clement Marcel Claudept_BR
dc.contributor.authorPrado, Pedro Cardosopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBonatto, Sandro Luispt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZaher, Hussampt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGrazziotin, Felipe Gobbipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-28T06:24:58Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2022pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2296-701Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/274343pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAlthough the recent advances on the relationship of its major groups, the systematics of the rich fauna of Neotropical snakes is far from being a consensus. In this sense, derived groups presenting continental distributions have represented a main challenge. The taxonomy of the snake tribe Echinantherini is one of the most contentious among the diverse family known as Dipsadidae. The tribe is poorly sampled in phylogenetic studies, resulting in conflicting hypotheses of relationships among its taxa. Moreover, several rare and micro endemic species of Echinantherini have never been evaluated within a comprehensive phylogenetic framework. Here, we assess for the first time the phylogenetic position of the rare Echinanthera amoena within Echinantherini. We based our analyses on a comprehensive multilocus dataset including 14 of the 16 species described for the tribe. Our results support the monophyly of Echinantherini and strongly indicate E. amoena as a unique lineage, phylogenetically positioned apart from all other congeners. From the three current genera (Echinanthera, Taeniophallus, and Sordellina) our results indicate that Echinanthera and Taeniophallus are paraphyletic, since the T. affinis species group is positioned as sister to Echinanthera (except E. amoena) clustering apart from the clade formed by the T. brevirostris and T. occipitalis groups. We describe new genera for the T. affinis and T. occipitalis species groups and an additional monospecific genus for E. amoena. Although we did not evaluate the phylogenetic position of T. nebularis, we described a new genus and removed it from Echinantherini since its morphology strikingly departs from all species now included in the tribe. Finally, we redefine the genera Echinanthera and Taeniophallus and we provide comments about further directions to study the biogeography and the evolution of morphological traits in Echinantherini.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Lausanne. Vol. 10 (Oct. 2022), e969263, 21 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectMorfologia comparadapt_BR
dc.subjectMolecular systematicsen
dc.subjectTaxonomiapt_BR
dc.subjectSordellinaen
dc.subjectTaeniophallusen
dc.subjectSerpente : Taxonomia animalpt_BR
dc.subjectXenodontinaeen
dc.titleIncreasing taxon sampling suggests a complete taxonomic rearrangement in Echinantherini (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001161447pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples