Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCarballo-Fazanes, Aidapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRey, Ezequielpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorValentini, Nadia Cristinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Fernández, José Eugeniopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVarela Casal, Cristinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRico-Díaz, Javierpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarcala-Furelos, Robertopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAbelairas-Gomez, Cristianpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-20T03:34:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/262403pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) is one of the most common tools for assessing the fundamental movement skills (FMS) in children between 3 and 10 years. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the TGMD—3rd Edition (TGMD-3) between expert and novice raters using live and video assessment. Five raters [2 experts and 3 novices (one of them BSc in Physical Education and Sport Science)] assessed and scored the performance of the TGMD-3 of 25 healthy children [Female: 60%; mean (standard deviation) age 9.16 (1.31)]. Schoolchildren were attending at one public elementary school during the academic year 2019–2020 from Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Raters scored each children performance through two viewing moods (live and slow-motion). The ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) was used to determine the agreement between raters. Our results showed moderate-to-excellent intra-rater reliability for overall score and locomotor and ball skills subscales; moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for overall and ball skills; and poor-to-good for locomotor subscale. Higher intra-rater reliability was achieved by the expert raters and novice rater with physical education background compared to novice raters. However, the inter-rater reliability was more variable in all the raters regardless of their experience or background. No significant differences in reliability were found when comparing live and video assessments. For clinical practice, it would be recommended that raters reach an agreement before the assessment to avoid subjective interpretations that might distort the results.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Basel. Vol. 18, n.4, 1652 (Feb. 2021) p. 1-14pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento motorpt_BR
dc.subjectTGMD-3en
dc.subjectAgreementen
dc.subjectHabilidade motorapt_BR
dc.subjectCriançaspt_BR
dc.subjectAssessmenten
dc.subjectFundamental motor skillsen
dc.subjectConfiabilidadept_BR
dc.subjectLiveen
dc.subjectAvaliação em saúdept_BR
dc.subjectSlow-motionen
dc.subjectRatersen
dc.titleIntra-Rater (live vs. video assessment) and inter-rater (expert vs. novice) reliability of the test of gross motor development : third editionpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001149562pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples