Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorGhezzi, Caroline Lorenzoni Almeidapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cristiano Köhlerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, Aline Spaderpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWestphalen, Stephanie Sanderpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSalazar, Cristiano Caetanopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVettorazzi, Janetept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T03:24:00Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/257132pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives: There have been no investigations on the association between previous abdominopelvic MRI experience without placental MRI experience and diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists with different experience levels in interpreting PAS-related MRI findings. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 women who underwent MRI for placental assessment between 2016 and 2020. MR images were reviewed by four radiologists who were blinded to the clinical outcomes and had different experience levels in interpreting PAS-related MRI findings. The radiologists’ diagnostic performance was evaluated according to the pathologic and surgical outcomes. Simple κ statistics were calculated to determine agreement among the radiologists. Results: Of 60 women, 46 were diagnosed with PAS. The maternal age mean ± SD was 33.0 years ± 5.0 for the PAS absent group and 36.0 ± 4.3 for the PAS present group (p = 0.013). Overall, the most experienced radiologist had the highest sensitivity (100%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 92.3–100%) and NPV (100%, 95% CI: 63.1–100%) in PAS diagnoses. However, the PPV and specificity were independent of experience. The most experienced radiologist had the highest diagnostic accuracy in PAS (90%, 95% CI: 79.5–96.2%) and placenta percreta (95%, 95% CI: 86.1–99.0%). There was a strong association between definitive PAS diagnoses and the highest experience level. The κ values for the interobserver agreement regarding PAS diagnoses were 0.67 for the most experienced radiologist (p < 0.001) and 0.38, 0.40, and 0.43 for the other radiologists (p = 0.001) and regarding placenta percreta diagnoses were 0.87 for the senior radiologist (p < 0.001) and 0.63, 0.57, and 0.62 for the other radiologists (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Previous experience in interpreting PAS-related MRI findings plays a significant role in accurately interpreting such imaging findings. Previous abdominopelvic MRI experience without specific placental MRI experience did not improve diagnostic performance. Advances in knowledge: We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature and that this paper will be of interest to the readership of your journal because to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first in which the correlation between previous experience in abdominopelvic MRI with no specific experience in PAS-related MRI and diagnostic accuracy of radiologists has been explored. Our results could aid in setting up specialized multidisciplinary teams to assist women with PAS disorders.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe British journal of radiology (1928). London. Vol. 94, no. 1128 (Dec. 2021), 20210827, 9 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectPlacenta acretapt_BR
dc.subjectImageamento por ressonância magnéticapt_BR
dc.subjectDesempenho profissionalpt_BR
dc.subjectRadiologistaspt_BR
dc.titleDiagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience in the interpretation of MRI of the placenta accreta spectrum disorderpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001164647pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples