Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Lais Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSperansa, Daniela Michelim Rodriguezpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Cristiane Bragapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBenites, Rosimari Malgarejopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Mariana Timmpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSekine, Leopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFranz, Juliana Pires Marafonpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-03T05:10:35Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2022pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2531-1379pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/252316pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Urgent blood component transfusions may be life-saving for patients in hemorrhagic shock. Measures to reduce the time taken to provide these transfusions, such as uncrossmatched transfusion or abbreviated testing, are available. However, transport time is still an additional delay and the use of a pneumatic tube system (PTS) may be an alternative to shorten the transport time of blood components. Objectives To assess pneumatic tube system transportation of blood components based on a validation protocol. Methods: Pre- and post-transport quality control laboratory parameters, visual appearance, transport time and temperature of the packed red blood cells (RBCs), thawed fresh plasma (TFP), cryoprecipitate (CR), and platelet concentrate (PC) were evaluated. Parameters were compared between transport via pneumatic tube and courier. Results A total of 23 units of RBCs, 50 units of TFP, 30 units of CR and ten units of PC were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were found between pre- and post-transport laboratory results. There was also no difference in laboratory parameters between transport modalities (PTS versus courier). All blood components transported matched regulatory requirements for quality criteria. The temperature during transport remained stable and the transport time via PTS was significantly shorter than the courier's transport time (p < 0.05). Conclusion The PTS was considered a fast, safe and reliable means of transportation for blood components, also securing quality prerequisites.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofHematology, transfusion and cell therapy. Rio de Janeiro. Vol. 44, no.4 (2022), p. 519-525.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectSanguept_BR
dc.subjectPneumatic tube systemen
dc.subjectHemólisept_BR
dc.subjectTransportationen
dc.subjectControle de qualidadept_BR
dc.subjectTransfusionen
dc.subjectBlood componenten
dc.subjectHemolysisen
dc.subjectQuality controlen
dc.titleValidation of blood components transport through a pneumatic tube systempt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001153343pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record