Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Leonardo Peterson dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEspírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro dopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRamis, Thiago Rozalespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPortes, Juliana Katarina Schoerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorChakr, Rafael Mendonça da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorXavier, Ricardo Machadopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T04:46:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/245637pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Rheumatoid arthritis(RA) and osteoarthritis(OA) patients showed systemic manifestations that may lead to a reduction in muscle strength, muscle mass and, consequently, to a reduction in functionality. On the other hand, moderate intensity resistance training(MIRT) and high intensity resistance training(HIRT) are able to improve muscle strength and muscle mass in RA and OA without affecting the disease course. However, due to the articular manifestations caused by these diseases, these patients may present intolerance to MIRT or HIRT. Thus, the low intensity resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (LIRTBFR) may be a new training strategy for these populations. Objective To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to verify the effects of LIRTBFR on muscle strength, muscle mass and functionality in RA and OA patients. Materials and methods A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials(RCTs), published in English, between 1957–2021, was conducted using MEDLINE(PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library. The methodological quality was assessed using Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2.0. Mean difference(MD) or standardized mean difference(SMD) and 95% confidence intervals(CI) were pooled using a random- effects model. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Five RCTs were included. We found no significant differences in the effects between LIRTBFR, MIRT and HIRT on muscle strength, which was assessed by tests of quadriceps strength(SMD = -0.01[-0.57, 0.54], P = 0.96; I2 = 58%) and functionality measured by tests with patterns similar to walking(SMD = -0.04[-0.39, 0.31], P = 0.82; I2 = 0%). Compared to HIRT, muscle mass gain after LIRTBFR was reported to be similar. When comparing LIRTBFR with low intensity resistance training without blood flow restriction(LIRT), the effect LIRTBFR was reported to be higher on muscle strength, which was evaluated by the knee extension test. Conclusion LIRTBFR appears to be a promising strategy for gains in muscle strength, muscle mass and functionality in a predominant sample of RA and OA women.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 16, no. 11 (Nov. 2021), e0259574, 16 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectExercício físicopt_BR
dc.subjectFluxo sangüíneopt_BR
dc.subjectForça muscularpt_BR
dc.subjectHipertrofiapt_BR
dc.subjectArtrite reumatóidept_BR
dc.subjectOsteoartritept_BR
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectMetanálisept_BR
dc.titleThe effects of resistance training with blood flow restriction on muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy and functionality in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review with meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001146399pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples