Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMachry, Rafael Vazpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCipriani, Gustavo da Fonsecapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPedroso, Henrique Umpierrept_BR
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Rafaela Ramospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPires, Thaymê Luísa de Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Raquelpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVescovi, Betinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Gabriela Pereira dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Ticiana da Costapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T04:30:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1758-5996pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/234482pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease among elderly population. As the disease progresses, insulin may become necessary. The use of pens application seems to be more practical. However, the infuence of this method on glycemic control needs to be defned in elderly people. Methods: Randomized clinical trial comparing pens and syringes for insulin application among patients with type 2 DM over 60 years old and Glycated Hemoglobin>8.5% at baseline. The follow-up was 24 weeks, with monthly medical visits to adjust the treatment. All patients received insulin NPH and, if necessary, insulin Regular. We assessed glycemic control, adherence to treatment, hypoglycemia occurrence, need for adjustment in treatment and impact on quality of life, Results: We included 121 patients with mean age of 65.75 years. Sixty-one were randomized for pen group (PG) and 60 patients for syringe group (SG). At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10.34±1.66% and 9.90±1.25% (p=0.103) in PG and SG respectively. Mean HbA1c was 8.39±1.28% in PG and 8.85±1.74% in SG (p=0.101) at 24 weeks. However, there was a more signifcant reduction in PG (− 1.94±1.93% in PG and − 1.04±1.46% in SG, p < 0.05) during follow-up. We found no diference in treatment adherence rates, hypoglycemia, greater need for insulin doses or oral medication, and progression to basal-bolus insulin scheme. We also found no diference in the impact of the disease on quality of life between groups. Conclusion: Although we did not fnd any diference in the impact on quality of life, frequency of hypoglycemia or adherence, the PG showed a reduction in HbA1c higher in 24 weeks of follow-up.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. Vol. 13 (2021), 64, 9 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectType 2 diabetesen
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus tipo 2pt_BR
dc.subjectElderlyen
dc.subjectIdosopt_BR
dc.subjectPen devicesen
dc.subjectInsulinapt_BR
dc.subjectControle glicêmicopt_BR
dc.subjectInsulinen
dc.subjectAdherenceen
dc.subjectGlycemic controlen
dc.titlePens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001135277pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples