Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorRemor, Eduardo Augustopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKluge, Ariane de Brito Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Bruno de Britopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Erika Pizziolopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMondelo, Gabriela Pasapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRemor, Eduardo Augustopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T04:24:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/231972pt_BR
dc.description.abstractA Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measure titled Cuestionario para la Evaluación de la Adhesión al Tratamiento Antiretroviral (acronym CEAT-VIH) is currently available in paper-and-pencil and digital (online assessment) formats. Due to the advantages of online assessment, the main objective of this work was to evaluate psychometric properties of the online version, in an international sample, to accumulate evidence of its validity and provide score norms for the questionnaire. A psychometric study was performed with an international sample of 1,470 participants, from 30 countries, to accumulate evidence of CEAT-VIH validity regarding internal structure and related external criterion (e.g., viral load, number of pills, and AIDSrelated symptoms). Descriptive statistics and normative data for scores are also presented. The majority of participants were men (72.4%), aged 15 to 78 years old (M = 39.3, SD = 12.6). A unidimensional model with five facets occurred as the observed variables converged, which presented a good model fit (comparative fit index [CFI] = 1.000; Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = 0.999; standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.027; and root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] [90% confidence interval, CI] = 0.009 [0.000, 0.038], p = .995). There was a weak invariance for the CEAT-VIH structure for language versions and countries. Cronbach’s alpha values for the instrument (17 items) were acceptable across language versions (.88-.96). Evidence of validity related to external criteria was achieved by associations (e.g., Spearman and Mann–Whitney) between CEAT-VIH scores and relevant clinical (e.g., CD4+ cells, viral load, number of pills, and AIDSrelated symptoms) and sociodemographic (e.g., gender, age, employment status, education level, place of residence, and participation at local AIDS association) variables. In conclusion, the overall data on the evaluated psychometric properties allow recommendation of the use of this instrument in research and applied settings.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofSage open. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2011-. Vol. 9, n. 3 (2019), 12 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectAdesão à medicaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectHIVen
dc.subjectAdherenceen
dc.subjectInfecções por HIVpt_BR
dc.subjectAntiretroviral therapyen
dc.subjectInquéritos e questionáriospt_BR
dc.subjectValidade dos testespt_BR
dc.subjectAssessmenten
dc.subjectPsychometricsen
dc.subjectCEAT-VIHen
dc.titleEvidence of validity for the online version of the assessment of adherence to antiretroviral therapy questionnairept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001125561pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples