Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMarques, Lis Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFossati, Ana Amélia Nunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Rômulo Batistapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Helen T. dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorIzaguirry, Aryele Pintopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRamalho, Juliana B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Jose Claudio Fonsecapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Francielli Weberpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Tiantianpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorStreit Júnior, Danilo Pedropt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T04:48:43Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/225559pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to compare the efficiency of vitrification and slow freezing techniques for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue containing immature follicles. In Experiment 1, assessment of cell membrane integrity by trypan blue exclusion staining was used to select the best cryoprotectant solution for each cryopreservation method. Primary growth (PG) oocytes showed the best percentage of membrane integrity (63.5 ± 2.99%) when SF4 solution (2 M methanol + 0.1 M trehalose + 10% egg yolk solution) was employed. The vitrification solution, which presented the highest membrane integrity (V2; 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me2SO + 0.5 M sucrose + 10% egg yolk solution) was selected for Experiment 2. Experiment 2 aimed to compare the vitrification and slow freezing techniques in the following parameters: morphology, oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity, and DNA damage. Frozen ovarian tissue showed higher ROS levels and lower mitochondrial activity than vitrified ovarian tissue. Ultrastructural observations of frozen PG oocytes showed rupture of the plasma membrane, loss of intracellular contents and a large number of damaged mitochondria, while vitrified PG oocytes had intact mitochondria and cell plasma membranes. We conclude that vitrification may be more effective than slow freezing for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofScientific reports. London. Vol. 9 (Oct. 2019), 15353, 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCriopreservaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectDanio reriopt_BR
dc.subjectTecido animalpt_BR
dc.titleSlow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissuept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001107565pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples