Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPuentes, Rodrigopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Fabrício Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, Agustínpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Fabrício Diaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Ana Claudiapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMaisonnave, Jaquelinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRoehe, Paulo Michelpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T04:38:40Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/224603pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBovine herpesviruses (BoHVs) types 1 (BoHV-1) and 5 (BoHV-5) are alphaherpesviruses of major importance to the bovine production chain. Such viruses are capable of establishing latent infections in neuronal tissues. Infected animals tend to develop a serological response to infection; however, such response—usually investigated by antibody assays in serum—may eventually not be detected in laboratory assays. Nevertheless, serological tests such as virus neutralization (VN) and various enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are widely employed to check individual or herd status of BoHV infections. The correlation between detection of antibodies and the presence of viral nucleic acids as indicatives of infection in infected cattle has not been deeply examined. In order to investigate such correlation, 248 bovine serum samples were tested by VN to BoHV-1 and BoHV-5, as well as in a widely employed (though not type-differential) gB ELISA (IDEXX IBR gB X2 Ab Test) in search for antibodies to BoHVs. Immediately after blood withdrawal, cattle were slaughtered and trigeminal ganglia (TG) excised for DNA extraction and viral nucleic acid detection (NAD) by nested PCR. Neutralizing antibodies to BoHV-1 and/or BoHV-5 were detected in 44.8% (111/248) of sera, whereas the gB ELISA detected antibodies in 51.2% (127/248) of the samples. However, genomes of either BoHV-1, BoHV-5, or both, were detected in TGs of 85.9% (213/248) of the animals. These findings reveal that the assays designed to detect antibodies to BoHV-1 and/or BoHV-5 employed here may fail to detect a significant number of latently infected animals (in this study, 35.7%). From such data, it is clear that antibody assays are poorly correlated with detection of viral genomes in BoHV-1 and BoHV-5-infected animals.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 11, no. 5 (May 2016), e0155941, 9 f.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectTestes imunológicospt_BR
dc.subjectInfecções por Herpesviridaept_BR
dc.subjectHerpesvirus bovino 1pt_BR
dc.subjectHerpesvírus bovino tipo 5pt_BR
dc.titleComparison between DNA detection in trigeminal nerve ganglia and serology to detect cattle infected with bovine herpesviruses types 1 and 5pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000996097pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples