Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorWilde, Sabrinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSarti, Caroline Simãopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorToniolo, Júliapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Bethania Paludo dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorGouvea, Daiana Backpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Nicole Marchioro dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Maria Luiza Vieirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Jonas de Almeidapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T04:28:08Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1519-0501pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/220525pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the survival of occlusal and occlusal-proximal restorations performed with resinmodified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) in deciduous molars using rubber dam and cotton rolls isolation. Material and Methods: Ninety-two patients were included and 200 deciduous molars with cavitated occlusal or occlusoproximal dentin caries lesions were randomized into two groups: cotton rolls (n = 100) and rubber dam (n = 100) and RMGIC restorations were placed. At baseline and in the follow-up visit, presence, severity and activity of caries lesions were registered. Two independent, blinded examiners evaluated the treated teeth clinically using the USPHS criteria and radiographically after 9 months. Descriptive analysis, survival curve (log-rank test) and Cox regression were performed to assess risk factors related to failure. Results: Out of the 179 teeth (92 cotton rolls group and 87 rubber dam group) evaluated at 9-month follow-up period. No lesion progression was observed radiographically. The overall treatment success rate was 85.47% (83.47% for cotton rolls and 87.35 rubber dam group). No significant difference between isolation methods was observed in the log-rank test (p = 0.16). Cox regression showed no risk factors related to failure. Conclusion: No difference was found in the survival of occlusal and occlusalproximal restorations performed with RMGIC in deciduous molars using a rubber dam and cotton rolls isolation after a 9-month follow-up period.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 21, (2021), p. 1-10, e0195pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDental Cariesen
dc.subjectCárie dentáriapt_BR
dc.subjectDiques de borrachapt_BR
dc.subjectRubber Damsen
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen
dc.subjectAnálise de sobrevidapt_BR
dc.subjectTooth, Deciduousen
dc.subjectDente decíduopt_BR
dc.subjectMolaren
dc.subjectDente molarpt_BR
dc.subjectEnsaio clínico controlado aleatóriopt_BR
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trialen
dc.subjectPré-escolarpt_BR
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectCriançapt_BR
dc.subjectBrasilpt_BR
dc.titleInfluence of isolation technique on the survival of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars : a 9-months randomized controlled trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001124110pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples