Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorRocha, Thiago Botter Maiopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Helen L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCaye, Arthurpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAnselmi, Lucianapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorArseneault, Louisept_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Fernando Celso Lopes Fernandes dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCaspi, Avshalompt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDanese, Andreapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves, Helenpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Hona Leept_BR
dc.contributor.authorHouts, Renatept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Ana Maria Baptistapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoffitt, Terrie E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMondelli, Valeriapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPoulton, Richiept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRohde, Luis Augusto Paimpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWehrmeister, Fernando Césarpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKieling, Christian Costapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T04:20:54Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0890-8567pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/218681pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: Prediction models have become frequent in the medical literature, but most published studies are conducted in a single setting. Heterogeneity between development and validation samples has been posited as a major obstacle for the generalization of models. We aimed to develop a multivariable prognostic model using sociodemographic variables easily obtainable from adolescents at age 15 to predict a depressive disorder diagnosis at age 18 and to evaluate its generalizability in 2 samples from diverse socioeconomic and cultural settings. Method: Data from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort were used to develop the prediction model, and its generalizability was evaluated in 2 representative cohort studies: the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study and the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Results: At age 15, 2,192 adolescents with no evidence of current or previous depression were included (44.6% male). The apparent C-statistic of the models derived in Pelotas ranged from 0.76 to 0.79, and the model obtained from a penalized logistic regression was selected for subsequent external evaluation. Major discrepancies between the samples were identified, impacting the external prognostic performance of the model (Dunedin and E-Risk C-statistics of 0.63 and 0.59, respectively). The implementation of recommended strategies to account for this heterogeneity among samples improved the model’s calibration in both samples. Conclusion: An adolescent depression risk score comprising easily obtainable predictors was developed with good prognostic performance in a Brazilian sample. Heterogeneity among settings was not trivial, but strategies to deal with sample diversity were identified as pivotal for providing better risk stratification across samples. Future efforts should focus on developing better methodological approaches for incorporating heterogeneity in prognostic research.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. New York. vol. 60, no. 2 (Feb. 2021), p. 262-273pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDepressãopt_BR
dc.subjectAdolescenten
dc.subjectCohort studiesen
dc.subjectAdolescentept_BR
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.subjectPrognósticopt_BR
dc.subjectPrognosisen
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten
dc.titleIdentifying adolescents at risk for depression : a prediction score performance in cohorts based in 3 different continentspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001122657pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples