Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Cárdenas, Yalil Augustopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Mora, Gustavo Armandopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAliaga-Del Castillo, Arónpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Heraldo Luis Dias dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuillén, Luis Ernesto Arriolapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T04:17:08Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/217117pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). Materials and methods: Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). Results: Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. Conclusions: Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE. São Francisco. Vol. 14, no. 12 (Dec. 2019), e0226267, 15 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDente pré-molarpt_BR
dc.subjectBicuspiden
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen
dc.subjectTomografia computadorizada de feixe cônicopt_BR
dc.subjectDente caninopt_BR
dc.subjectCuspiden
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen
dc.subjectOrtodontiapt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos retrospectivospt_BR
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectTraçãopt_BR
dc.subjectTractionen
dc.titleRoot and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted caninespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001114874pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples