Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMancuso, Aline Castello Brancopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Lianept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T02:30:02Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-2563pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/198321pt_BR
dc.description.abstractOver the years, several studies that compare individual forecasts with the combination of forecasts were published. There is, however, no unanimity in the conclusions. Furthermore, methods of combination by regression are poorly explored. This paper presents a comparative study of three methods of combination and their individual forecasts. Based on simulated data, it is evaluated the accuracy of Artificial Neural Networks, ARIMA and exponential smoothing models; calculating the combined forecasts through simple average, minimum variance and regression methods. Four accuracy measurements, MAE, MAPE, RMSE and Theil’s U, were used for choosing the most accurate method. The main contribution is the accuracy of the combination by regression methods.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofActa scientiarum : technology. Maringá. vol. 41 (2019), e41452, 9 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCombination of forecastsen
dc.subjectPrevisõespt_BR
dc.subjectForecastingen
dc.subjectAccuracyen
dc.subjectSimulationen
dc.titleA comparative study on combinations of forecasts and ther individual forecasts by means of simulated seriespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001098306pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem