Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMarchi, Nino Cesarpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorScherer, Juliana Nichterwitzpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPachado, Mayra Pachecopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Luciano Santos Pintopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSiegmund, Gersonpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Melina Nogueira dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorHalpern, Silvia Chwartzmannpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBumaguin, Daniela Benzanopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFormigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Marcelopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPechansky, Flaviopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKessler, Felix Henrique Paimpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T02:45:48Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2017pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1516-4446pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/185192pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95%CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.4560.28) and 2 (5.3860.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (1999). São Paulo. vol. 39, n. 4 (out./dez. 2017), p. 346-351.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectFamilyen
dc.subjectRelações familiarespt_BR
dc.subjectFamily relationshipsen
dc.subjectTranstornos relacionados ao uso de cocaínapt_BR
dc.subjectCohesionen
dc.subjectTranstornos relacionados ao uso de álcoolpt_BR
dc.subjectSubstance abuseen
dc.subjectAlcohol useen
dc.subjectCrack-cocaine useen
dc.titleCrack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol userspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001081881pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples