Chlorhexidine with or without alcohol against biofilm formation : efficacy, adverse events and taste preference
| dc.contributor.author | Santos, Gabriela Otero dos | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author | Milanesi, Fernanda Carpes | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author | Greggianin, Bruna Frizon | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernandes, Marilene Issa | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author | Oppermann, Rui Vicente | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.author | Weidlich, Patrícia | pt_BR |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-05T02:32:56Z | pt_BR |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1806-8324 | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/166176 | pt_BR |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, different chlorhexidine formulations have been tested, including an alcohol-free alternative, but the effect of this solution on early biofilm formation is not clear. A crossover, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of two chlorhexidine solutions against supra- and subgingival biofilm formation (NCT#02656251). Thirty-five participants were randomized and asked to rinse twice daily with 15 ml of an alcohol-containing 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, an alcohol-free 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, or placebo. The study was conducted in three experimental periods of 4 days each, with a 10-day washout between the periods. All the experimental periods followed the same protocol, except that the solutions were switched. Biofilm distribution was evaluated every 24 hours by the Plaque-Free Zone Index, during 96 hours. Adverse events were self-reported and sensory evaluation was performed using a hedonic scale. Compared to the placebo, the chlorhexidine solutions resulted in a significantly higher number of surfaces free of plaque over 96 hours (p < 0.01), and were able to prevent subgingival biofilm formation (p < 0.01). The alcohol-free chlorhexidine solution was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events, compared with alcohol-containing chlorhexidine (p < 0.05); it also received better sensory evaluation and acceptance by trial participants, compared with the alcohol-containing chlorhexidine (p = 0.007), and had a similar inhibitory effect on the formation of supra- and subgingival biofilms. | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | pt_BR |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 31 (2017), p. e32, 1-9 | pt_BR |
| dc.rights | Open Access | en |
| dc.subject | Chlorhexidine | en |
| dc.subject | Clorexidina | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | Mouthwashes | en |
| dc.subject | Álcoois | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | Biofilmes | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | Dental plaque | en |
| dc.subject | Cross-over studies | en |
| dc.subject | Alcohols | en |
| dc.title | Chlorhexidine with or without alcohol against biofilm formation : efficacy, adverse events and taste preference | pt_BR |
| dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.nrb | 001027102 | pt_BR |
| dc.type.origin | Nacional | pt_BR |
Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License
-
Artigos de Periódicos (44386)Ciências da Saúde (12174)


