Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorToscano, Cristiana Mariapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZhuo, Xiaohuipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorImai, Kumikopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Bruce Bartholowpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPolanczyk, Carisi Annept_BR
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Pingpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEngelgau, Michaelpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Maria Inêspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-04T02:16:26Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1758-5996pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/148808pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in developing countries remains unknown. The Brazilian government conducted a nationwide population screening program for type 2 diabetes mellitus (BNDSP) in which 22 million capillary glucose tests were performed in individuals aged 40 years and older. The objective of this study was to evaluate the life-time cost-effectiveness of a national population-based screening program for DM2 conducted in Brazil. Methods: We used a Markov-based cost-effectiveness model to simulate the long-term costs and benefits of screening for DM2, compared to no screening program. The analysis was conducted from a public health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of results to key model parameters. Results: Brazilian National diabetes screening program will yield a large health benefit and higher costs. Compared with no screening, screen detection of undiagnosed diabetes resulted in US$ 31,147 per QALY gained. Results from sensitivity analyses found that screening targeted at hypertensive individuals would cost US$ 22,695/QALY. When benefits from early glycemic control on cardiovascular outcomes were considered, the cost per QALY gained would reduce significantly. Conclusions: In the base case analysis, not considering the intangible benefit of transferring diabetes management to primary care nor the benefit of using statin to treat eligible diabetic patients, CE ratios were not cost-effective considering thresholds proposed by the World Health Organization. However, significant uncertainty was demonstrated in sensitivity analysis. Our results indicate that policy-makers should carefully balance the benefit and cost of the program while considering using a population-based approach to screen for diabetes.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome. [London]. Vol. 7, n. 95 (2015), 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus tipo 2pt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise custo-eficiênciapt_BR
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of a national population‑based screening program for type 2 diabetes : the Brazil experiencept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000998327pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples