Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBaggio, Roberta Camineiropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBerni, Paulo Eduardo de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarpenedo, Alexandre de Freitaspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-21T07:57:04Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2159-4635pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/301747pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe redemocratization of Latin American countries in the 1980’s and 1990’s was often accompanied by the promulgation of new constitutional texts, a fact that poses the risk of conflict with the legislation produced during the authoritarian periods. Not all countries in the region, however, face the issue of the permanence of authoritarian legality from the adoption of a new constitutional paradigm. Chile, in which the political transition did not lead to a rupture of the constitutional order, the confrontation of the theme of the validity of authoritarian norms did not have room before the restrictions of access to constitutional jurisdiction: only from the constitutional reforms of 2005 the Chilean Constitutional Court was raised to protagonist of the confrontation of this authoritarian legacy. The way in which the Court has faced the issue of the validity of such legislation is the main object of research, by investigating the legal solutions found to resolve the controversies regarding such rules, the indication 1) of the understanding of the role of the judges of the Constitutional Court in contributing to the overcoming of the prevailing normative production standards so far, as well as 2) of their willingness to manage the constitutional text with a view to consolidating the formal democracy regime established. This reflection involves an analysis of the decisions taken by the Court regarding the reception of standards and their institutional design forged in the political transition process. The hypothesis proposed was that, as occurred in post-war transitions with some Courts of European countries, the way in which the reception theory of such norms applies is connected with transitional experiences in terms of continuity or not of the authoritarian legacy. The results indicate that the application of the Reception Theory in Chile presents an outstanding result of that of the North countries.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBeijing Law Review. [S.l.]: Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP). Vol. 15, n. 3 (sept. 2024), p. 1158-1177.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDitadura : Chilept_BR
dc.subjectDireito Constitucional : Chilept_BR
dc.subjectPoder judiciário : Chilept_BR
dc.subjectCorte constitucional : Chilept_BR
dc.subjectAutoritarismo : Chilept_BR
dc.subjectTransição política : Chilept_BR
dc.titleAuthoritarian legality and constitutional jurisdiction in Chile : continuities and ruptures in the formation of constitutionalism from the 1990’spt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001297197pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples