Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorAristimunha, Patrícia Cruzpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMallheiros, R. D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerket, Peter R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCardinal, Kátia Mariapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoreira Filho, Alexandre Lemos de Barrospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, E. T.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCavalcante, Danilo T.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Andrea Machado Lealpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T03:25:18Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1056-6171pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/256219pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the additive effects of a commercial feed supplementation blend (Ava Cid P)—consisting of humic substances, coated sodium butyrate, and a small acidifier portion— on the growth, immune response, and gut health of broiler chickens. A total of 540 female and 540 male broilers were raised from 1–49 d. On the first day, the animals were distributed in a completely randomized 2 × 5 factorial design (2 sexes and 5 treatments) with 7 replications of 15 birds each. The 5 treatments were 1) birds did not receive Ava Cid P (control); 2) birds received 0.91 kg/t of Ava Cid P from 1–21 d (AVA1–21); 3) birds received 0.91 kg/t of Ava Cid P from 1–21 d and 0.45 kg/t from 22–35 d (AVA1–35); 4) birds received 0.91 kg/t of Ava Cid P from 1–21 d and 0.45 kg/t from 22–42 d (AVA1–42); and 5) birds received 0.91 kg/t of Ava Cid P from 1–21 d, 0.45 kg/t from 22–35 d, and 0.23 kg/t from 36–49 d (AVA1–49). ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were applied to compare the means (P < 0.05) between treatments. The Ava Cid P showed no effect on male or female growth performance or goblet cell density. However, the supplement modified gut morphometry, and jejunum villi were 32% higher at 9 and 35 d in the AVA1–35 birds compared with those of the control group. The apparent villus surface and villus height increased by 87% and 46%, respectively, in the AVA1–49 birds compared with the AVA1–21 birds. The expression of mucin 2 (MUC2) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were 1.6% and 0.9% lower in the AVA1–21 birds than in the control birds, but no effects were observed for interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-10. The Ava Cid P altered the mRNA expression of MUC2 and TNF-α and some characteristics of intestinal morphometry, but did not change the performance of broilers.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Poultry Research. Athens. Vol. 29, no. 1 (Mar. 2020), p. 85-94pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectFrango de cortept_BR
dc.subjectAnimal performanceen
dc.subjectSodium butyrateen
dc.subjectÁcido húmicopt_BR
dc.subjectDesempenho animalpt_BR
dc.subjectGut morphometryen
dc.subjectHumic aciden
dc.subjectMorfologia animalpt_BR
dc.titleEffect of dietary organic acids and humic substance supplementation on performance, immune response and gut morphology of broiler chickenspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001164071pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples