Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRocha, Daniela Tonini dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSalle, Felipe de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Karen Apellanispt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFurian, Thales Quedipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro dopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Hamilton Luiz de Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSalle, Carlos Tadeu Pippipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T04:48:17Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1972-2680pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/225542pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) are responsible for avian colibacillosis and human urinary tract infections, respectively. There are genetic similarities between the APEC and UPEC pathotypes, suggesting the APEC strains could be a potential reservoir of virulence and antimicrobial-resistance genes for the UPEC strains. This study aimed to characterize and compare APEC and UPEC strains regarding the phylogroup classification, pathogenicity and antimicrobial susceptibility. Methodology: A total of 238 APEC and 184 UPEC strains were selected and characterized. The strains were assayed for antimicrobial susceptibility and classified into phylogenetic groups using a multiplex-PCR protocol. In addition, the APEC strains had previously been classified according to their in vivo pathogenicity. Results: The results showed that both pathotypes had variation in their susceptibility to most of the antimicrobial agents evaluated, with few strains classified as multidrug resistant. The highest resistance rate for both pathotypes was to amoxicillin. Classifying the APEC and UPEC strains into phylogenetic groups determined that the most frequently frequencies were for groups D and B2, respectively. These results reflect the pathogenic potential of these strains, as all the UPEC strains were isolated from unhealthy patients, and most of the APEC strains were previously classified as pathogenic. Conclusions: The results indicate that distribution into phylogenetic groups provided, in part, similar classification to those of in vivo pathogenicity index, as it was possible to adequately differentiate most of the pathogenic and commensal or low-pathogenicity bacteria. However, no relationship could be found between the specific antimicrobial agents and pathogenicity or phylogenetic group for either pathotype.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Infection in Developing Countries. [Sassari, Italy]. Vol. 15, no. 7 (July 2021), p. 962-971pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectEscherichia coli patogênia aviária (APEC)pt_BR
dc.subjectAPECen
dc.subjectUPECen
dc.subjectEscherichia coli uropatogênica (UPEC)pt_BR
dc.subjectPathogenicityen
dc.subjectResistência a antimicrobianospt_BR
dc.subjectPatogenicidadept_BR
dc.subjectAntimicrobial susceptibilityen
dc.subjectFilogeniapt_BR
dc.subjectPhylogenetic groupsen
dc.titleAvian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) and uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) : characterization and comparisonpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001130048pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem