Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSevilla Noarbe, Ignaciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Basilio Xavierpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDES Collaborationpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T02:30:54Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/195741pt_BR
dc.description.abstractWe perform a comparison of different approaches to star–galaxy classification using the broadband photometric data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey. This is done by performing a wide range of tests with and without external ‘truth’ information, which can be ported to other similar data sets. We make a broad evaluation of the performance of the classifiers in two science cases with DES data that are most affected by this systematic effect: large-scale structure and MilkyWay studies. In general, even though the default morphological classifiers used for DES Y1 cosmology studies are sufficient to maintain a low level of systematic contamination from stellarmisclassification, contamination can be reduced to theO(1 per cent) level by using multi-epoch and infrared information from external data sets. For Milky Way studies, the stellar sample can be augmented by ~20 per cent for a given flux limit.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofMonthly notices of the royal astronomical society. Oxford. Vol. 481, no. 4 (Dec. 2018), p. 5451–5469pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectMethods: data analysisen
dc.subjectCatalogos astronomicospt_BR
dc.subjectMethods: statisticalen
dc.subjectFotometria astronômicapt_BR
dc.subjectTechniques: photometricen
dc.titleStar–galaxy classification in the Dark Energy Survey Y1 data setpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001090634pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples