Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarques, Pedro Rochapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPeripolli, Vanessapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLampert, Vinícius do Nascimentopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDias, Eduardo Antunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gabriel Ribaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Tamara Esteves dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Marcela Kuczynski dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Julio Otavio Jardimpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T04:06:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2017pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1516-3598pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/189585pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to identify types of production system and their main indicators on bioeconomic efficiency, using qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate beef cattle farms in the western region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul. A survey was carried out with 43 farmers operating in the western region of that state. All farms operated with complete cycle production systems in areas larger or equal to 900 ha. A qualitative questionnaire with binary answers and a quantitative questionnaire with numerical answers were applied. Technology and Management drivers were used for the calculation of the efficiency index of farmers obtained by both questionnaires. Farmers were divided into three clusters: low-efficiency level (LEL), intermediate-efficiency level (IEM), or high-efficiency level (HEL), as a result of the comparison of the scores obtained for the analyzed parameters. Subfactors resulting from each comparison (LEL × IEL; LEL × HEL, and IEL × HEL) were different as a function of the comparison and of the methods applied. Low-efficiency level farmers need to improve essential production processes, such as technology and management, as well as health management practices together with the financial management of the production system. Intermediate-efficiency level farmers need to improve their routine animal management, pasture management, and calculation of financial indicators to become highly efficient. The quantitative method allowed to identify underestimation (39.3%) or overestimation (24.2%) when farmers were are classified in clusters. Different methods may be used, but those based on quantitative information have stronger discrimination power to identify different types of farmers.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista brasileira de zootecnia. Viçosa, MG. Vol. 46, n. 1 (Jan. 2017), p. 65-71pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectBeef cattle farmersen
dc.subjectProdução animalpt_BR
dc.subjectGado de cortept_BR
dc.subjectEvaluation methodsen
dc.subjectEfficiencyen
dc.subjectSistema de produçãopt_BR
dc.subjectClusters analysisen
dc.titleA proposal for the evaluation of the bioeconomic efficiency of beef cattle production systemspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001082828pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record