Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartins, Ana Taispt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-20T02:32:43Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1828-1567pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/122597pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to review the definitions and vagueness of the concept of imaginary and symbolic, and to relate its limits and its reach within the research in Communication. The difficulties of the approach in Communication to a notion of course of the sense are addressed. Inherited from the School of Grenoble, this notion underlies the theory of the imaginary. Communication is here considered to be insufficient for the study of the catalysis of imaginaries and the production of symbolic images which are present in communication phenomena. This is due not only to the inadequacy of a process that is described in terms of sendermessage- receiver, but especially to the self-evidence of imaginary and symbolic, as expressed in the language, resulting in a reduction of the imaginary to its social symptoms.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isofrapt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofMetábasis.it : Philosophie et Communication. Varese : Mimesis. Vol. 10, n. 19 (Mai 2015), p. 168-185pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectImagináriopt_BR
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectImaginaryen
dc.subjectSchool of Grenobleen
dc.subjectLanguageen
dc.subjectSocial sciencesen
dc.titleL’imaginaire et l’hypostasie de la communicationpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeThe imaginary and the communication hypostasis en
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000971360pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record