Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVenâncio, Sônia Isoyamapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBuccini, Gabriela dos Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Claudia Regina Lindgrenpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBortoli, Maritsa Carla dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorBernal, Regina Tomie Ivatapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEickmann, Sophie Helenapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFrias, Paulo Germanopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGiugliani, Elsa Regina Justopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Miriam Oliveira dospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-21T04:38:20Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0021-7557pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/247657pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Child Development Assessment Questionnaire (QAD-PIPAS). Methods: This methodological study was comprised of two axes. The first one aimed to analyze the instrument's construct validity (discriminant and concurrent validity) and internal consistency, and the second one examined test-retest reliability, involving two different samples and procedures. For construct validity and internal consistency, the sample was recruited in Embu das Artes-SP, Brasilia-DF and Recife-PE during the immunization campaign in 2017, involving caregivers of 2005 children under 60 months of age (1295 under 36 and 710 from 37 to 59 months). For the test-retest analysis the sample consisted of 30 children aged 0–59 months old that attended daycare centers in Embu das Artes-SP in 2018. Results: Multivariate analyses of construct validity showed that the QAD-PIPAS was able to identify the association between the outcome (suspected child development delays) and expected risk and protective factors based on Nurturing Care Framework (OMS/UNICEF). A significant positive correlation was achieved between the scores of the QAD-PIPAS and CREDI in six of the eight age groups analyzed, with the most significant correlations being in the age groups from 25 to 30 and 31–36 months. Acceptable internal consistencies were identified in all age groups, with better performance above 36 months of age (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.61 to 0.80). We also found an adequate test-retest reliability (global Kappa 0.81). Conclusion: The QAD-PIPAS showed evidence of construct validity and reliability to be used in population studies involving children aged 0–59 months during multi-vaccination campaigns in Brazil.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJornal de pediatria. Rio de Janeiro. Vol. 97, no. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2021), p. 637-645pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento infantilpt_BR
dc.subjectChild developmenten
dc.subjectValidation studiesen
dc.subjectEstudo de validaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos populacionais em saúde públicapt_BR
dc.subjectPopulation assessmenten
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectBrasilpt_BR
dc.titlePsychometric properties of the Child Development Assessment Questionnaire (QAD-PIPAS) for use in population studies involving Brazilian children aged 0-59 monthspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001148008pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record