Self-reported adherence to physical activity recommendations compared to the IPAQ interview in patients with hypertension
dc.contributor.author | Riegel, Glaube Raquel Conceição | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Martins, Giulia Bobisch | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidt, Afonso Guilherme | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Rodrigues, Marcela Perdomo | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Nunes, Gerson Luis da Silva | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Correa Junior, Vicente | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Fuchs, Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Fuchs, Flávio Danni | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro, Paula Aver Bretanha | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Moreira, Leila Beltrami | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-11T04:11:21Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 1177-889X | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217920 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Physical activity (PA) is recommended as adjuvant therapy to control blood pressure (BP). The effectiveness of simple recommendations is not clear. We aimed to assess the agreement between self-report of adherence to PA in clinical routine and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) interview and its association with BP control. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with hypertensive outpatients. Adherence to recommendation to PA was assessed by the physician and IPAQ interview. A cutoff of 150 minutes/week was used to classify active or nonactive patients. High sitting time was considered >4 hours/day. A total of 127 individuals (SBP 144.9±24.4 mmHg/DBP 82.0±12.8 mmHg) were included. Results: A total of 69 subjects (54.3%) reported to be active to their physician, whereas 81 (63.8%) were classified as active by IPAQ (6.3% active in leisure time PA). Kappa test was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.06–0.37). The rate of BP control was 45.7%. There was no association with the reported PA assessed by both methods nor with sitting time. Our results demonstrated poor agreement between self-report adherence and IPAQ interview, and neither evaluation was associated with BP control. Conclusion: Our findings underpin evidences that a simple PA recommendation has low association with BP control in clinical settings. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Patient preference and adherence. Auckland. vol. 13 (2019), p. 209-214 | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Open Access | en |
dc.subject | Exercício | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Blood pressure | en |
dc.subject | Suspensão de tratamento | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Exercise | en |
dc.subject | Hipertensão | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Treatment adherence | en |
dc.subject | Self-report | en |
dc.subject | Hypertension | en |
dc.subject | Physical activity counseling | en |
dc.title | Self-reported adherence to physical activity recommendations compared to the IPAQ interview in patients with hypertension | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.nrb | 001120771 | pt_BR |
dc.type.origin | Estrangeiro | pt_BR |
Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License
-
Artigos de Periódicos (39096)Ciências Biológicas (3016)
-
Artigos de Periódicos (39096)Ciências da Saúde (10544)