Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPerez, Vinícius Pietapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Jéssica Karoliny Baptista Portopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Marianne Schrader dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRossato, Adriana Medianeirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDani, Carolinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCorção, Gertrudespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorD'Azevedo, Pedro Alvespt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T04:06:46Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1517-8382pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/217150pt_BR
dc.description.abstractCoagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently isolated in clinical specimens and are important reservoirs of resistance genes. In 2019, the Brazilian government set the BrCAST/EUCAST (Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines as the national standard, resulting in changes in the interpretation of CoNS susceptibility tests. From outpatients, disk-diffusion susceptibility of 65 CoNS cultures were evaluated and compared using classification criteria from both CLSI and BrCAST/EUCAST. The isolates were identified using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF), and the presence of the mecA gene was determined. The most prevalent species were Staphylococcus saprophyticus (32.3%), S. haemolyticus (18.5%), and S. epidermidis (9.2%). Almost perfect agreement was seen between the guidelines, except concerning oxacillin and gentamicin, and the prevalence of multidrug resistant isolates increased with the use of BrCAST/EUCAST. Of all, 15 (23.1%) isolates, mainly S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, were positive for the mecA gene, and only three were detected when using CLSI or BrCAST/EUCAST disk-diffusion screening. This, using either guideline, could reveal the difficulty of determining oxacillin resistance. Using warning zones or molecular methods might well be indicated for CoNS. In conclusion, adoption of the BrCAST/EUCAST guidelines will result in certain artificial changes in epidemiological susceptibility profiles, and clinicians and institutions should be aware of the possible implications.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian journal of microbiology. Rio de Janeiro. Vol. 51, no. 3 (Sept. 2020), p. 1071-1078pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectInfecções estafilocócicaspt_BR
dc.subjectAntimicrobial susceptibility testingen
dc.subjectGuias como assuntopt_BR
dc.subjectBrazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testingen
dc.subjectResistência microbiana a medicamentospt_BR
dc.subjectEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testingen
dc.subjectClinical Laboratory Standards Instituteen
dc.subjectCoagulase-negative staphylococcien
dc.subjectOxacillin resistanceen
dc.titleCoagulase-negative staphylococci in outpatient routines : the implications of switching from CLSI to BrCAST/EUCAST guidelinespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001120416pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples