Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorZillig, Raphaelpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-10T02:33:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1981-9471pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340pt_BR
dc.description.abstractFor the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of ancient philosophy. São Paulo. Vol. 12, n. 1 (2018), p. 129-172pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectAristóteles, 384-322 A.Cpt_BR
dc.subjectÉticapt_BR
dc.subjectFilosofiapt_BR
dc.titleDialética e o método da ética em Aristótelespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001070733pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem