Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCaumo, Wolneipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Luciana da Conceiçãopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorElkfury, Jéssica Lorenzzipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHerbstrith, Evelyn Grabinpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSipmann, Raquel Busanellopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Andressa dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Iraci Lucena da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Vinícius Souza dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNeblett, Randypt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T02:26:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2017pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1178-7090pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/172691pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The primary aim was to assess the psychometric properties (including internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, and factor structure) of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), adapted and validated for a Brazilian population (CSI-BP). Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between the CSI-BP and the serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and determined if the symptoms elicited by the CSI-BP discriminate between subjects who do/do not respond to the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) task, as assessed by change in numeric pain scale (0–10) score. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a pain clinic in a tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 222 adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain and 63 healthy control subjects completed the CSI-BP and the Brazilian Portuguese pain-catastrophizing scale (BPPCS). A team of experts translated the CSI according to the international guidelines. Test–retest, item analysis, convergent validity, and factor analysis were performed. Later, a random subsample (n=77) was used to correlate the CSI-BP adjusted index with change in numeric pain-scale score during the CPM task and a BDNF blood sample Results: The CSI-BP presented strong psychometric properties (test–retest reliability 0.91, Cronbach’s a=0.91). Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a four-factor structure, supporting the original English version. The CSI-BP adjusted index showed moderate positive correlation with the BP-PCS, and classified more than 80% of patients correctly vs healthy controls. Serum BDNF levels explained 27% of the variation in the CSI-BP adjusted index. Subjects with impairment in the descending modulatory system had higher CSI-BP adjusted index scores than subjects who responded normally to the CPM task: 49.35 (12.1) vs 39.5 (12.33), respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion: The CSI-BP was found to be a psychometrically strong and reliable instrument, with primary evidence of validity. Higher scores on the CSI-BP were correlated positively with serum BDNF and with greater dysfunction of the descending pain-modulatory system.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of pain research [recurso eletrônico]. Auckland. Vol. 2017, no. 10 (1 Sept. 2017), p. 2109-2122pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectConfirmatory factor analysisen
dc.subjectPsicometriapt_BR
dc.subjectFator neurotrófico derivado do encéfalopt_BR
dc.subjectCross-cultural adaptationen
dc.subjectConditioned pain modulationen
dc.subjectAnálise fatorialpt_BR
dc.subjectSensibilização do sistema nervoso centralpt_BR
dc.subjectSerum brain-derived neurotrophic factoren
dc.subjectCentral sensitizationen
dc.subjectDor crônicapt_BR
dc.subjectChronic painen
dc.titleThe Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for a brazilian population : psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factorpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001059387pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples