Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Tuany Rafaelipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMármora, Belkiss Câmarapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrochado, Fernanda Thomépt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Lucas Gonçalvespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Paloma Santos dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorLamers, Marcelo Lazzaronpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Aurigena Antunes dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Caroline Addison Carvalho Xavier dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Susana Barbosapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Marco Antonio Trevizanipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPilar, Emily Ferreira Sallespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Manoela Dominguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Vivian Petersenpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T07:56:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2025pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0365-0596pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/296508pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground The clinical advantages of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy in skin healing and its underlying mechanism remain subjects of ongoing debate. Objective This study aims to explore the impact of LED therapy on normal skin keratinocytes (HaCaT) and in the repair of full-thickness dorsal wounds in Wistar rats. Methods HaCaT cell viability (SRB assay) and migration (scratch assay) were assessed under LED therapy, comparing stress conditions (2.5% FBS) with sham irradiation and optimal conditions (10% FBS). In vivo, 50 rats with induced wounds were divided into Sham and LED (daily treatment) groups. Euthanasia occurred at 3, 5, 10, 14, and 21 days for clinical, morphological, oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, and GSH), and cytokine analyses (IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α). Results LED therapy significantly enhanced keratinocytes viability compared to sham irradiation, with minimal impact on cell migration. Clinical benefits were prominent on day 10, influencing inflammation progression and resolution on days 3 and 10. Re-epithelization remained unaffected. Reduced MDA and increased GSH levels were observed throughout, while SOD levels varied temporally. Notably, on day 10, LED significantly decreased IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α. Study limitations Although translational, clinical trial confirmation of observed benefits is warranted. Conclusions LED therapy expedites cutaneous healing in the experimental model, primarily modulating inflammation and enhancing antioxidant activity.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofAnais brasileiros de dermatologia. Barcelona. Vol. 100, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2025), p. 54-62pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCell culture techniquesen
dc.subjectTécnicas de cultura de célulaspt_BR
dc.subjectCitocinaspt_BR
dc.subjectCytokinesen
dc.subjectTerapia com luz de baixa intensidadept_BR
dc.subjectLow-level light therapyen
dc.subjectDermatologyen
dc.subjectDermatologiapt_BR
dc.subjectModelos animaispt_BR
dc.subjectModels, animalen
dc.subjectOxidative stressen
dc.subjectEstresse oxidativopt_BR
dc.titleRed light-emitting diode on skin healing : an in vitro and in vivo experimental studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001292299pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record