Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBoccolini, Cristiano Siqueirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLacerda, Elisa Maria de Aquinopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBertoni, Neilanept_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Natáliapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Nadya Helena Alvespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFarias, Dayana Rodriguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCrispim, Sandra Patriciapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro, Leticia Barroso Vertullipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchincaglia, Raquel Machadopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGiugliani, Elsa Regina Justopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Inês Rugani Ribeiro dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorKac, Gilbertopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-01T06:56:44Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2059-7908pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/284541pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground The comprehension of breastfeeding patterns and trends through comparable indicators is essential to plan and implement public health policies. Objective To evaluate the trends of breastfeeding indicators in Brazil from 1996 to 2019 and estimate the gap to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets in children under 5 years. Methods Microdata from two National Surveys on Demography and Health of Women and Children (PNDS-1996 and PNDS-2006) and the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition-2019 were used. The indicators of early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF), exclusive breastfeeding of infants 0–5 months of age (EBF<6mo), continued breastfeeding at 1 year of age (CBF1yr) and CBF at 2 years of age (CBF2yr) were analysed using prevalence and 95% CI. The average annual variation and years to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets were calculated for Brazil and the macroregions. Statistical analyses considered the survey’s complex sample design for each database. Results EIBF increased from 36.3% (95% CI 33.6% to 39.0%) in 1996 to 60.9% (95% CI 56.5% to 65.3%) in 2006 (statistically significant) and 62.5% (95% CI 58.3% to 66.6%) in 2019. EBF<6mo increased from 26.9% (95% CI 21.3% to 31.9%) in 1996 to 39.0% (95% CI 31.0% to 47.1%) in 2006 and 45.8% (95% CI 40.9% to 50.7%) in 2019 (significant increases for 1996–2019 for Brazil, Northeast and Midwest regions). CBF1yr rose from 36.6% (95% CI 30.8% to 42.4%) in 1996 to 48.7% (95% CI 38.3% to 59.0%) in 2006, and 52.1% (95% CI 45.4% to 58.9%) in 2019. CBF2yr increased from 24.7% (95% CI 19.5% to 29.9%) in 1996 to 24.6% (95% CI 15.7% to 33.5%) in 2006 and 35.5% (95% CI 30.4% to 40.6%) in 2019 (significant increase for 1996–2019). The South and Southeast regions need to double the 2019 prevalence to reach the target for the CBF1yr and CBF2yr; the Northeast and North need to increase 60% the current prevalence for the indicator of EBF<6mo. Conclusion A substantial improvement in breastfeeding indicators occurred in Brazil from 1996 to 2019, although at an insufficient rate to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targets.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Global health. [London]. Vol. 8, no. 9 (2023), e012529, 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectAleitamento maternopt_BR
dc.subjectEpidemiologiapt_BR
dc.subjectFenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactentept_BR
dc.subjectFenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição infantilpt_BR
dc.subjectBrasilpt_BR
dc.titleTrends of breastfeeding indicators in Brazil from 1996 to 2019 and the gaps to achieve the WHO/UNICEF 2030 targetspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001239938pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples