Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Aline Lutz dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorZanotto, Bruna Stellapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEtges, Ana Paula Beck da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRuschel, Karen Brasilpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Taís de Campospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Felipe Cezarpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHarzheim, Ernopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Marcelo Rodriguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorUmpierre, Roberto Nunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Fabianapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Rodolfo Souza dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPolanczyk, Carisi Annept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-21T06:56:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/282697pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to ascertain utility and vision-related quality of life in patients awaiting access to specialist eye care. A secondary aim was to evaluate the association of utility indices with demographic profile and waiting time. Methods: Consecutive patients that had been waiting for ophthalmology care answered the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). The questionnaire was administered when patients arrived at the clinics for their first visit. We derived a utility index (VFQ-UI) from the patients' responses, then calculated the correlation between this index and waiting time and compared utility across demographic subgroups stratified by age, sex, and care setting. Results: 536 individuals participated in the study (mean age 52.9±16.6 years; 370 women, 69% women). The median utility index was 0.85 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.70-0.92; minimum 0.40, maximum 0.97). The mean VFQ-25 score was 70.88±14.59. Utility correlated weakly and nonsignificantly with waiting time (-0.05, P = 0.24). It did not vary across age groups (P = 0.85) or care settings (P = 0.77). Utility was significantly lower for women (0.84, IQR 0.70-0.92) than men (0.87, IQR 0.73-0.93, P = 0.03), but the magnitude of this difference was small (Cohen's d = 0.13). Conclusion: Patients awaiting access to ophthalmology care had a utility index of 0.85 on a scale of 0 to 1. This measurement was not previously reported in the literature. Utility measures can provide insight into patients' perspectives and support economic health analyses and inform health policies.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 19, no. 8 (2024), e0307691, 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectOftalmologiapt_BR
dc.subjectTelemedicinapt_BR
dc.subjectQualidade de vidapt_BR
dc.subjectInquéritos e questionáriospt_BR
dc.subjectVisão ocularpt_BR
dc.titleUtility index and vision-related quality of life in patients awaiting specialist eye carept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001214255pt_BR
dc.description.originTelemedicinapt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record