Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCorrea, Sly Wongchuigpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Rodrigo Cauduro Dias dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Vinícius Alencarpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Fabricept_BR
dc.contributor.authorFleischmann, Ayan Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBiancamaria, Sylvainpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorParis, Adrienpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorParrens, Mariept_BR
dc.contributor.authorAl Bitar, Ahmadpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T06:53:22Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0043-1397pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1944-7973pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/281599pt_BR
dc.description.abstractSatellite remote sensing enhances model predictions by providing insights into terrestrial and hydrological processes. While data assimilation techniques have proven promising, there is a lack of standardized and effective approaches for integrating multiple observations simultaneously. This study presents a novel assimilation framework, the multi‐observation local ensemble‐Kalman‐filter (MoLEnKF), designed to effectively integrate multiple variables, even at scales different than the model. Evaluation of MoLEnKF in the Amazon River basin includes assimilation experiments with remote sensing data only, including water surface elevation (WSE), terrestrial water storage (TWS), flood extent (FE), and soil moisture (SM). MoLEnKF demonstrates improvements in a scenario where regions lack in‐situ hydroclimatic records and when assuming uncertainties of large‐scale hydrologic‐hydrodynamic models. Assimilating WSE outperforms daily discharge and water‐level estimations, achieving 38% and 36% error reduction, respectively. However, the monthly evapotranspiration estimate achieves the greatest error reduction by assimilating SM with 11%. MoLEnKF always remains in second position in a ranking of error and uncertainty reduction, providing an intermediate condition, being able to holistically outperform univariate experiments. MoLEnKF also outperform state‐ofthe‐art models in many cases. This study suggests potential improvements, urging exploration of correlations between assimilated variables and adaptive localization methods based on seasonality. The flexibility and the elegant way of expressing the LEnKF equations by MoLEnKF facilitates their application with different types of variables, compatible with large‐scale hydrologic‐hydrodynamic models and missions such as SWOT. Its robustness ensures easy replicability worldwide, facilitating hydrological reanalysis and improved forecasting, establishing MoLEnKF as a valuable tool for the scientific community in hydrological research.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofWater resources research. Vol. 60, no. 8 (Aug. 2024), [Article] e2024WR037155, p. 1-34pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofWater Resources Research. Washington. Vol. 60, no. 8 (Aug. 2024), [Article] e2024WR037155, p. 1-34pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectModelos hidrológicospt_BR
dc.subjectEnsemble Kalman filteren
dc.subjectRemote sensingen
dc.subjectModelos hidrodinâmicospt_BR
dc.subjectHydrologic-hydrodynamic modelingen
dc.subjectGrandes baciaspt_BR
dc.subjectMultiple observationsen
dc.subjectSensoriamento remotopt_BR
dc.subjectFiltro de Kalmanpt_BR
dc.subjectAssimilação de dadospt_BR
dc.titleMulti‐Satellite Data Assimilation for Large‐Scale Hydrological‐Hydrodynamic Prediction: Proof of Concept in the Amazon Basin.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001211571pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem