Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, André Fernandes dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorVeronezi, Tayná Mayerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZardo, Izadora Loeffpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerronatto, João Victor Barbieript_BR
dc.contributor.authorFranck, Kirian Renatapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSpiering, Adriana Gonçalvespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Luciana Nevespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fernanda Vieira Amorim dapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T03:48:09Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1098-612Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/256728pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a preappointment oral dose of gabapentin on the neurological examination of cats. Methods A prospective, randomized and blinded clinical trial was conducted in 35 client-owned healthy cats. Cats were scheduled for two appointments and randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or a 100 mg gabapentin capsule prior to the second veterinary visit. A neurological examination was performed during each visit, and the results were compared between groups. Normal/abnormal response rates for each test were based on the number of cats that allowed the test to be performed. Results Gabapentin was administered to 17 cats. Gait and postural reactions were significantly affected in the gabapentin group. Comparing the gabapentin with the placebo groups, proprioceptive ataxia was identified in 4/17(23.5%) vs 0/18 cats (P=0.0288); paw placement deficits were seen in 10/11(90.9%) vs 1/4(25%) cats; table tactile placement deficits were identified in 13/17(76.5%) vs 0/18 cats (P<0.0001); hopping deficits were seen in 5/17(29.4%) vs 0/16 cats (P=0.0185); and abnormalities on wheelbarrowing and extensor postural thrust were reported in 5/17(29.4%) vs 0/18 cats (P=0.0129). These results had no correlation with age or dose/kg received. No significant difference was noted in the assessment of level and content of consciousness, posture, cranial nerves and spinal nerves. No significant differences were noted in test compliance or examination duration. Conclusions and relevance Gabapentin significantly altered gait analyses and postural reactions in this group of healthy cats. The administration of gabapentin could lead to false–positive results and, possibly, an incorrect identification of neurological lesions. In contrast, gabapentin did not impair the assessment of cranial nerves and spinal reflexes, which can be assessed in patients receiving the drug.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. London. Vol. 25, no. 2 (Feb. 2023), 8 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectSedacaopt_BR
dc.subjectSpecies-specific musicen
dc.subjectHospitalizationen
dc.subjectBem-estar animalpt_BR
dc.subjectNeurologia animalpt_BR
dc.subjectWell-beingen
dc.subjectSalivary cortisolen
dc.subjectGatospt_BR
dc.subjectCat stress scoreen
dc.titleDoes preappointment gabapentin affect neurological examination findings? a prospective, randomized and blinded study in healthy catspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001163710pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record