Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
dc.contributor.author | Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Duarte, Alexandre Scalli Mathias | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Lavinsky, Joel | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Castilho, Arthur Menino | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Chone, Carlos Takahiro | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Crespo, Agrício Nubiato | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-29T03:24:30Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 1808-8694 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256375 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. Methods: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male met- allurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 88, no. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2022), p. 891-895 | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Open Access | en |
dc.subject | Noise | en |
dc.subject | Audiometria | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Monitoramento do ruído | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Noise-induced | en |
dc.subject | Hearing loss | en |
dc.subject | Perda auditiva | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Objective audiometry | en |
dc.title | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.nrb | 001163937 | pt_BR |
dc.type.origin | Nacional | pt_BR |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License
-
Artículos de Periódicos (39774)Ciencias Biologicas (3109)