Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRabello, Camila Zimmermannpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKopper, Patrícia Maria Polipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerri, Lucenio João Macedopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSignor, Brunapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHashizume, Lina Naomipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFontanella, Vania Regina Camargopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGrecca, Fabiana Soarespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorScarparo, Roberta Kochenborgerpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T04:55:05Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/252267pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the physicochemical properties of MTA Angelus (MTA-A), MTA Repair HP (MTA-HP), and Biodentine (BD). Setting times (n = 7) were determined in accordance with ASTM C266–15. Solubility (n = 11), pH (n = 10), and calcium ion release (n = 10) were evaluated up to 28 days in accordance with ANSI/ADA specification no. 57. Radiopacity was assessed by ANSI/ADA (n = 10) and the tissue simulator method (n = 10). In both methods, the specimens were radiographed using an aluminum stepwedge and the digital radiographs were analyzed in Adobe Photoshop, determining the mean grayscale pixel values of the materials, of the 3-mm aluminum stepwedge, and of the dentin, the latter of which was analyzed on the tissue simulator. The data obtained from each test were statistically analyzed and compared (p < 0.05). MTA-A presented longer final setting time compared with the other materials. There were no significant differences in the mass values of materials during the experiment. All materials presented an alkaline pH. BD promoted greater calcium ion release in most of the experimental periods. All materials presented appropriate radiopacity. BD showed lower radiopacity than MTA-A in the tissue simulator method. All groups presented higher radiopacity in the tissue simulator when compared with the ANSI/ADA method. MTA-A, MTA-HP, and BD showed appropriate physicochemical properties and radiopacity, and were considered suitable to be used in clinical practice.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 35 (2021), e069, 8 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectEndodontiapt_BR
dc.subjectEndodonticsen
dc.subjectBiocompatible materialsen
dc.subjectMateriais biocompatíveispt_BR
dc.subjectMateriais restauradores do canal radicularpt_BR
dc.subjectRoot canal filling materialsen
dc.subjectDental materialsen
dc.subjectMateriais dentáriospt_BR
dc.titlePhysicochemical properties of three bioceramic cementspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001148655pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem