Validation of the Brazilian version of the child pain catastrophizing scale and its relationship with a marker of central sensitization
dc.contributor.author | Schneider, Larissa | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Mallman, Eliza Saggin | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Evaldt, Cibelle de Abreu | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Souza, Andressa de | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Rodrigues, Josy da Silva | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Mendanha, Clarissa | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Caumo, Wolnei | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Stefani, Luciana Paula Cadore | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-26T04:47:52Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-7094 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250322 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives The Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child version (PCS-C) allows to identify children who are prone to catastrophic thinking. We aimed to adapt the Brazilian version of PCS-C (BPCS-C) to examine scale psychometric properties and factorial structure in children with and without chronic pain. Also, we assessed its correlation with salivary levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Methods The Brazilian version of PCS-C was modified to adjust it for 7–12 years old children. To assess psychometric properties, 100 children (44 with chronic pain from a tertiary hospital and 56 healthy children from a public school) answered the BPCS-C, the visual analogue pain scale, and questions about pain interference in daily activities. We also collected a salivary sample to measure BDNF. Results We observed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s value = 0.81). Parallel analysis retained 2 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis of our 2-factor model revealed consistent goodness-of-fit (IFI = 0.946) when compared to other models. There was no correlation between visual analogue pain scale and the total BPCS-C score; however, there was an association between pain catastrophizing and difficulty in doing physical activities in school (p = 0.01). BPCS-C total scores were not different between groups. We found a marginal association with BPCS-C (r = 0.27, p = 0.01) and salivary BDNF levels. Discussion BPCS-C is a valid instrument with consistent psychometric properties. The revised 2-dimension proposed can be used for this population. Children catastrophism is well correlated with physical limitation, but the absence of BPCS-C score differences between groups highlights the necessity of a better understanding about catastrophic thinking in children. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Revista brasileira de anestesiologia = Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, Rio de Janeiro. Vol. 72, n. 5 (2022), p. 614-621 | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Open Access | en |
dc.subject | Dor crônica | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Catastrophizing | en |
dc.subject | Pain catastrophizing | en |
dc.subject | Estudo de validação | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Chronic pain | en |
dc.subject | Criança | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Biomarcadores | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Validation studies as topic | en |
dc.subject | Children | en |
dc.subject | Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor | en |
dc.subject | BDNF | en |
dc.title | Validation of the Brazilian version of the child pain catastrophizing scale and its relationship with a marker of central sensitization | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de periódico | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.nrb | 001150064 | pt_BR |
dc.type.origin | Nacional | pt_BR |
Files in this item
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
-
Journal Articles (39774)Exact and Earth Sciences (6068)
-
Journal Articles (39774)Health Sciences (10633)