Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampertpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinskipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorScherer, Maitê Munhozpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPedrotti, Djessicapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBottezini, Paola Arosipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Ricardo Abreu dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, Lucianopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLenzi, Tathiane Larissapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T04:44:31Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1519-0501pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/236559pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25-0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98-0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 21, (2021), e0016, 10 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectRoot canal preparationen
dc.subjectPreparo de canal radicularpt_BR
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen
dc.subjectDente decíduopt_BR
dc.subjectDeciduous toothen
dc.titleReciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001136089pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Files in this item

Thumbnail
   

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Show simple item record