Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSolis-Urra, Patriciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Martinez, Javierpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOlivares-Arancibia, Jorgept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCastro Piñero, Josépt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSadarangani, Kabir P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Gersonpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Rodríguez, Fernandopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGaya, Anelise Reispt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFochesatto, Camila Felinpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCristi Montero, Carlospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-03T04:27:33Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2021pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1600-0838pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/229527pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to establish the association and differences in a diversity of cognitive domains according to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscular fitness (MF), and speed- agility fitness (S- AF) level in a large sample of Chilean schoolchildren. 1171 Chilean schoolchildren aged 10– 14years participated. CRF, MF, and S- AF were as-sessed through the ALPHA- fitness test battery. Cognition was evaluated through the NeuroCognitive Performance Test, which involved eight tests related to four main domains: cognitive flexibility (CF), working memory (WM), inhibitory control (IC), and intelligence (IN). Both global (multivariate) and individual (univariate) analyses were performed to determine the differences in cognitive functioning according to low- , middle- , and high- fitness level. The global analyses showed a significant main effect for CRF, F(16,940)=3.08, p.001 and MF groups, F(16,953)=2.30, p=.002, but not for S- AF, F(16,948)=1.37, p=.105. CRF shows a significant main effect in seven of eight tests, involving CF, WM, IC, and IN domains, whereas MF shows a significant main effect in five of eight tests without association with IN. SA- F shows a significant main effect only with IC. Statistical differences were found between the low- and middle/high- fitness groups but not between the middle- and high- fitness groups. At a global level, both CRF and MF seem to be associated with a higher cog-nitive profile in scholars; however, at an individual level, all fitness components show a favorable relationship to some cognitive domine. Then, future cognitive develop-ing strategies should consider all fitness components, prioritizing those low- fitness schoolchildren.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. London. Vol. 31, n. 6 (June 2021), p. 1352-1362pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCogniçãopt_BR
dc.subjectAdolescentsen
dc.subjectEstilo de vida saudávelpt_BR
dc.subjectCognitionen
dc.subjectHealthy lifestyleen
dc.subjectForça muscularpt_BR
dc.subjectMuscle strengthen
dc.subjectAptidão físicapt_BR
dc.subjectPhysical fitnessen
dc.subjectAdolescentespt_BR
dc.subjectSchoolsen
dc.titlePhysical fitness and its association with cognitive performance in Chilean schoolchildren: the Cogni-Action Projectpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001130827pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples