Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorStein, Cinarapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMigliavaca, Celina Borgespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorColpani, Verônicapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Priscila Raupp dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSganzerla, Danielpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGiordani, Natalia Elispt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Sandro René Pinto de Sousapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Luciane Nascimentopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPolanczyk, Carisi Annept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Antônio Luiz Pinhopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFalavigna, Maiconpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-27T04:22:54Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/226252pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground Chagas disease is a neglected chronic condition caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, with high prevalence and burden in Latin America. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, and amiodarone has been widely used for this purpose. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of amiodarone in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. Methodology We searched MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS up to January 2018. Data from randomized and observational studies evaluating amiodarone use in Chagas cardiomyopathy were included. Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was accessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Principal findings We included 9 studies (3 before-after studies, 5 case series and 1 randomized controlled trial). Two studies with a total of 38 patients had the full dataset, allowing individual patient data (IPD) analysis. In 24-hour Holter, amiodarone reduced the number of ventricular tachycardia episodes in 99.9% (95%CI 99.8%-100%), ventricular premature beats in 93.1% (95%CI 82%-97.4%) and the incidence of ventricular couplets in 79% (RR 0.21, 95%CI 0.11–0.39). Studies not included in the IPD analysis showed a reduction of ventricular premature beats (5 studies), ventricular tachycardia (6 studies) and ventricular couplets (1 study). We pooled the incidence of adverse side effects with random effects meta-analysis; amiodarone was associated with corneal microdeposits (61.1%, 95%CI 19.0–91.3, 5 studies), gastrointestinal events (16.1%, 95%CI 6.61–34.2, 3 studies), sinus bradycardia (12.7%, 95%CI 3.71–35.5, 6 studies), dermatological events (10.6%, 95%CI 4.77–21.9, 3 studies) and drug discontinuation (7.68%, 95%CI 4.17–13.7, 5 studies). Quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Conclusions Amiodarone is effective in reducing ventricular arrhythmias, but there is no evidence for hard endpoints (sudden death, hospitalization). Although our findings support the use of amiodarone, it is important to balance the potential benefits and harms at the individual level for decision-making.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE. San Francisco, CA. Vol. 12, no. 8 (Aug. 2018), e0006742, 14 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDoença de Chagaspt_BR
dc.subjectArritmias cardíacaspt_BR
dc.subjectAmiodaronapt_BR
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectMetanálisept_BR
dc.titleAmiodarone for arrhythmia in patients with Chagas disease : a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001129752pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples