Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Pedro Maria de Abreupt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Bianca Ottpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPodgaiski, Luciana Reginapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDias, Amanda Camarapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPillar, Valerio de Pattapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOverbeck, Gerhard Ernstpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMendonça Junior, Milton de Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBoldrini, Ilsi Iobpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-26T04:46:45Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/221545pt_BR
dc.description.abstractGrazing exclusion may lead to biodiversity loss and homogenization of naturally heterogeneous and species-rich grassland ecosystems, and these effects may cascade to higher trophic levels and ecosystem properties. Although grazing exclusion has been studied elsewhere, the consequences of alleviating the disturbance regime in grassland ecosystems remain unclear. In this paper, we present results of the first five years of an experiment in native grasslands of southern Brazil. Using a randomized block experimental design, we examined the effects of three grazing treatments on plant and arthropod communities: (i) deferred grazing (i.e., intermittent grazing), (ii) grazing exclusion and (iii) a control under traditional continuous grazing, which were applied to 70 x 70 m experimental plots, in six regionally distributed blocks. We evaluated plant community responses regarding taxonomic and functional diversity (life-forms) in separate spatial components: alpha (1 x 1 m subplots), beta, and gamma (70 x 70 m plots), as well as the cascading effects on arthropod high-taxa. By estimating effect sizes (treatments vs. control) by bootstrap resampling, both deferred grazing and grazing exclusion mostly increased vegetation height, plant biomass and standing dead biomass. The effect of grazing exclusion on plant taxonomic diversity was negative. Conversely, deferred grazing increased plant taxonomic diversity, but both treatments reduced plant functional diversity. Reduced grazing pressure in both treatments promoted the break of dominance by prostrate species, followed by fast homogenization of vegetation structure towards dominance of ligneous and erect species. These changes in the plant community led to increases in high-taxa richness and abundance of vegetation-dwelling arthropod groups under both treatments, but had no detectable effects on epigeic arthropods. Our results indicate that decision-making regarding the conservation of southern Brazil grasslands should include both intensive and alleviated levels of grazing management, but not complete grazing exclusion, to maximize conservation results when considering plant and arthropod communities.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 15, no. 1 (Jan. 2020), e0227706, 23 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectArtrópodespt_BR
dc.subjectGrazingen
dc.subjectGrasslandsen
dc.subjectPastagenspt_BR
dc.subjectArthropodaen
dc.subjectBiodiversityen
dc.subjectPlant taxonomyen
dc.subjectSpecies diversityen
dc.subjectEcosystemsen
dc.subjectPlantsen
dc.titleLong-term ecological research in southern Brazil grasslands: effects of grazing exclusion and deferred grazing on plant and arthropod communitiespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001124389pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples