Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Michelle Roxopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Marco Antonio Trevizanipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Manoela Dominguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchmitz, Carlos André Aitapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDal Moro, Rafael Gustavopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorD'Avila, Otávio Pereirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRados, Dimitris Rucks Varvakipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorUmpierre, Roberto Nunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Marcelo Rodriguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarrard, Vinícius Coelhopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T04:10:25Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/215117pt_BR
dc.description.abstractEstomatoNet was created in the south of Brazil to provides specialist support over a webbased platform to primary care dentists for diagnosis of oral lesions. To evaluate the usability of EstomatoNet and to identify user perceptions regarding their expectations and difficulties with the system; and to compare the perceptions of regular users of the service to those of first-time users. Sixteen dentists were selected for the study: 8 were frequent users of EstomatoNet and 8 were residents who had never used the Platform. To assess usability, participants were required to request telediagnosis support for a fictional case provided by the research team. During the process of uploading the information and sending the request, users were asked to “think out loud,” expressing their perceptions. The session was observed by an examiner with remote access to the user’s screen (via Skype). After the simulation, users completed the System Usability Scale (SyUS), a validated tool with scores ranging from 0 to 100. The mean SyUS score assigned by frequent users was 84.7±6.6, vs. 82.2±9.3 for residents (satisfactory usability: score above 68). The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (Student t test, P = .55). The residents group took longer (347.1±101.1s) to complete the task than frequent users (252.8±80.3s); however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (Student t test, P = .06). In their subjective evaluation, users suggested the inclusion of a field to add further information on outcomes and resolution of the case and changes in the position of the “Send” button to improve workflow. The present results indicate satisfactory usability of EstomatoNet. The Platform seems to meet the needs of users regardless of how experienced they are; nevertheless, a few minor changes in some steps would improve the tool.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 15, no. 6 (June 2020), e0233572, 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectSaúde bucalpt_BR
dc.subjectTelemedicinapt_BR
dc.subjectDiagnósticopt_BR
dc.subjectMucosa bucalpt_BR
dc.titlePerceived usability of a store and forward telehealth platform for diagnosis and management of oral mucosal lesions : a cross-sectional studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001118138pt_BR
dc.description.originTelemedicinapt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem