Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCortelli, Sheila Cavalcapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fernando Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRode, Sigmar de Mellopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHaas, Alex Nogueirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Ana Karina Pinto dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorPannuti, Cláudio Mendespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, Elaine Cristinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Eliete Rodrigues dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCortelli, José Robertopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPedrazzi, Viniciuspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-12T02:14:28Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743pt_BR
dc.description.abstractDifferent reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 28, nesp (Jan. 2014), p. 1-9pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectMouthwashesen
dc.subjectAntissépticos bucaispt_BR
dc.subjectBiofilmsen
dc.subjectBiofilmespt_BR
dc.subjectPrótese dentáriapt_BR
dc.subjectDental prosthesisen
dc.titleMouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patientspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000936603pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem